This is unedited, exactly as it appeared when sent from the Listbot mailing system

Subject: Critical letters
Dear readers of http://finalbookofdaniel.com 

Here are a few critical letters from readers received after the last 
e-message. Sorry, but Daniel must at least attack some misconceptions, and 
there are many. It's not easy being a prophet/angel. This often results 
from impossible expectations of "perfection." Cannot please them all. 
Never will. At least the majority are still there. 


****** 

One reader sent this: 


"I have a real problem with economic and political analysis being made 
based largely on biblical interpretation. The Book of Revelation for 
example is so subject to multiple interpretation, with some writers saying 
it points to future events and other writers saying it has already been 
fulfilled in the past, that I wouldn't want to base any economic and 
political analysis on it. And I am tired of the gloom and doom typically 
due to such biblical analysis, plus the constant attempts to do 
date-setting on when some event is supposed to occur, whether it be the 
mark of the beast, Y2K computer crashes, world war 3, etc. I prefer to 
(and do) look more directly at what is going on in 
politics and the economy to analyze same." 

J 

******** 

Daniel's response: 

J, I actually agree with you whole-heartedly. You must remember at all 
times that I do not and have not and will not base any "analysis" based 
strictly on the Bible. Except that which has been unfulfilled. The vast 
majority HAS been fulfilled. 

The economic and strategic analyses and "prophecies" you read herein are 
not based on the typical method. You have never seen me attempt to link 
WWIII or y2k or "mark of the beast" with Biblical prophecy, nor the 
economy. 

I too am tired of "doom and gloom" of much prophecy. Sick of it. Yet I've 
seen it, and will not ignore it. 

The book of Revelation has been fulfilled as well. Almost 2000 years ago. 
Daniel is not here to alert anyone of a "7-year tribulation," where an 
"Antichrist" and beast take over with a reconstruction of a Jewish temple 
takes place etc.. And WWIII actually has NOTHING to do with Biblical 
prophecy, although many believe it does. "666" and the "Beast/Antichrist" 
was actually Nero of ROME BEFORE 70 A.D. 

The insights Daniel has received in his 21st century return are actually 
NEW revelations, concerning 2004/2005 Iraq, Fourth Turning, Second Coming, 
etc. It is a continuation of scriptures. 

The only thing that remains of Biblical prophecy is the END; a handful of 
New Testament prophecies of the coming of the Son of Man. And a few 
sentences in Daniel 12. That's essentially it! The rest is history. Daniel 
has returned to witness this End. Of the Age. The vision of the end has 
already been given. This is not tired old speculation, but REALITY. 

But this has been determined not through Biblical studies and elaborate 
theories, but from actual, profound visions given to Daniel during the 
awakening happening now, which happens to coincide with certain Biblical 
passages. I do not speculate, but have been given the bottom line. God 
would not send Daniel back to engage in such nonsensical trivia; it is 
much too important. 

On date setting: I agree we should not date set. On one exception: when 
angelified Daniel actually receives from the Creator a date in which 
something is to occur. I've directly received 2004/2005. I do not know all 
the details. I do not know the date of the Second Coming, for example. It 
could be 2012. Or it could be 2018, or later, I, nor any other human 
knows. But the purpose at all times is to induce warning, in order to 
perhaps change the future. 

I am on your side with regard to the continual speculation that takes 
place with regard to this respect in terms of Biblical prophecy. But don't 
you think God would give Daniel an edge in visions regarding the future? 
For his return? Of course God would. Daniel's not here simply to witness, 
but to take part. 

I don't place authority on scriptures, but the fresh, divine visions 
received thus far-- from God, my authority. And the prophetic visions have 
in fact been coming true, 100%! 


Now, concerning the last sentence, let's move on to the next reader who 
responded, after I asked non-believer to unsubscribe. 

************ 



"Hi Daniel. 
Well the weight hasn't quite been lifted from your shoulders because 
although I have asked three times to be taken from your mailing 
list, I am still receiving your material. Before I go though, just 
a few last comments. You say that your prophesies have been 100 
percent accurate, yet I can remember at least two occasions when 
you were obliged to apologize for falsely calling the beginning 
of the 'great bear market'. Talk about historical revision! As far 
as predicting a slow down in the U.S. economy, well who hasn't seen 
that coming? Even I knew that would happen. I also have strange 
dreams sometimes as do the other six billion people on this planet 
but am not quite deluded enough to believe that my particular ones 
are from a divine source. You once described yourself as a 'humble' 
person. Well you sure do put yourself in exalted company these days. The 
Buddha, Krishna, Christ? 
And now without further ado please take me from your mailing list. 
Good luck." 
Mike Williams. 

********** 

Daniel's response: 



Well, Mike, 

First of all, lol! Another misguided and ill-informed reader, attempting 
to focus on the whole "Biblical prophets are 100% accurate" myth. Let's 
analyze his claims first. He speaks of an "inaccuracy" in future 
predictions. You know what? He's correct! I DID make a couple false calls 
in terms of a future bear market. But WHEN did this occur? 

It occurred before being awakened as an angel and endowed with the Holy 
Spirit as the identified return of Daniel. He's referring to an off the 
hand economic analyses which here delivered in 1999 and 1998 on the web 
site. 

They were not based on any divine dreams, nor did I say "Thus says the 
Lord." 

Does Mike expect me to know everything about the future, Even at the age 
of 20? Of 10? At the age of 4? Did Jesus, or Jeremiah or Isaiah or Ezekiel 
know everything all their lives? 
Everyone must remember that I started writing publicly without the 
expectation I would become Daniel. That ultimately occurred in late 1999, 
1.5 years after first writing. 

If one is willing to research the facts, one will see that indeed the 
VISIONS I've received have indeed come true, with an accuracy rate of 100% 

But Mike is making the same mistake many common folks do; that a prophet 
of God merely goes around "making predictions." This done while ignoring 
several factors, such as when I was awakened; WHEN I became a prophet. Was 
I a prophet at the age of 10? An angel? NO. And it did not become so until 
October of 1999. Times before this were merely a preparation. 

Read the story of Jonah. He "made predictions" of Nineveh's destruction. 
Yet they listened...and it was NOT destroyed. So is he a false prophet? 
No. In fact he was a success. 

The same happened with the warnings issued by me and others for the 
potential y2k crisis. Does this mean we were "false prophets?" No, because 
the potential crisis was averted, because people actually listened. 

I make a warning once again, and this will be the final one: WWIII WILL in 
fact happen, "THUS SAITH THE LORD," unless we collectively succeed in 
altering this event. And I will gladly submit to a death if we manage to 
avert this war. Even though I would have been successful in altering the 
future. As did Jonah. 

I also understand Mike's cynicism with regard to me "receiving divine 
visions" as oppossed to others' visions. This hurts when someone says 
this, because Daniel's the real thing. And it draws tears that someone 
would suggest such a thing. 

******* 


Let's further expand on this concept from this letter from Charles, 




* 
"Well, if someone has to suffer, better you than me I guess (lol). I agree 
100% with your views on religion and spirituality. However religion fills 
the social needs of people -- their need to belong to a group and to share 
the beliefs of the group. So anyone that seeks a more enlightened view of 
the world is going to travel a difficult path, the road less traveled, so 
to speak. Speaking of predictions about the economy, could you be a little 
more specific about what will happen and when it will happen? There are 
still quite a few of us that haven't overcome our baser needs yet. Thanks 
for your messages and your trials and tribulations on our behalf". Charles 

********* 

Daniel's response. 

I am here to suffer, and serve you all, and glad to. 

Speaking of the economy indeed. 

Mike's letter raised this issue. There is no way under God's sun that He 
will allow Daniel to allow ALL details of the economy to be revealed. Onlt 
that required. If I were to attempt to speculate on "details," there would 
never be a chance in heaven or hell that I could ever be 100% correct. No 
human ever has been able to do so. Nor any Biblical prophet. Or angel. 

You see, my site began as an economic analysis site dealing with a rough 
outline of the future. I did not expect I would become Daniel. Yet it 
happened shortly before y2k. After I had been saying it could be a 
disaster for quite some time. The unenlightened person would rashly 
dismiss me as a "false prophet" in such a circumstance. 

Those who understand what prophecy is really about would be calling me 
the truest prophet on earth. For they understand that the most successful 
prophecy is not one that is fulfilled, but altered through warning and 
active intervention. 

The first of the "visions from God" happened just before the 1999 
awakening and endowment of the Holy Spirit. It was of the outcome of y2k; 
to be a non-event. I had been warning otherwise on the site for more than 
a year at the time. But the VISION came true. THEN God awakened me. Do you 
understand? Well, most will not. 


See, we must differentiate that which occurred BEFORE the awakening, and 
AFTER. Everything that has occurred after has indeed been visions with a 
"100% accuracy rate." 
I suppose, however, that some people cannot ever perceive this. 


The next letter came from this fellow. 



******* 



"I can only say, that I truly hope you are what you say you are in every 
sense of the term. I will continue to listen. I have since you first 
began. We all need to feel that little bit of hope in an other wise boring 
earth experience filled with what seems to be equal amounts of pain as 
there is pleasure. I pray you are not just crazy, and I say that with an 
empathy. I really pray you are. Stranger things have happened. But till I 
ultimately know, I will always be skeptic. Its part of human nature, to be 
cautious, especially due to our horrible mistakes in the past history. I 
need no reply, but if you wish to by all means. I consider myself one of 
the ordinary, nothing special just looking for the truth in all of this. I 
know there is a reason, I too have read all the near death experiences, 
and out of body experience, including kundilani, and many other such 
phenomenon, I am open minded. But not foolish, there are things that 
cannot be explained by science, so I still search." 

A 

********* 

Daniel's response: 


I understand your skepticism. I hear you. I don't expect everyone to 
agree, but admire your open-mindedness. No, of course I'm not deluded. 

Do you know what it is like to walk into places, on an almost daily basis, 
and be flabbergasted at the light and wings radiating off the back, 
disrupting everyplace you walk into? 
That has been the case since October 1999. I've only documented 10 % of 
them. 

At first it was a novelty. It has become a near irritation. I will go to a 
local diner wishing simply to be quiet and have a meal in silence and read 
the paper. But what generally happens is that the spirit radiating from 
the body, and the visible wings cause a disruption, and all attention 
becomes directed at me. This disrupts my meal. I can no longer function as 
a human being in the standard sense of the word. 


You should see what happens at work. (Yes, they are reading these words, 
and cannot respond just yet.) 
Again, I understand why someone simply "reading these words" would have 
such a reaction, but I assure you, the situation is substantially more 
profound in person; those who have witnessed it. A massive disconnect 
effect. 


The next absurd letter I received was very short: 


"Who's going to win next years Super bowl? Id like to place a large bet on 
it." 


****** 

Daniel's response: 


Again here is someone "asking for a sign." It is ridiculous to respond to 
such a message. Ask an angel to pray to God for the outcome of...a sports 
game, to profit from it? Only an evil and adulterous generation would 
demand a sign. 


Which brings me to one last point. During Daniel's temptation period of 
summer and fall of 2000, he requested to some for "testimonies" of those 
who witness the super-natural transfiguration of angelified Daniel in 
churches and other locales. This has been done regularly with profound 
reaction. But those witnessing it are afraid to respond. I also came to 
the conclusion soon after that this is not necessary to "prove" I am 
Daniel, as my words, deeds and fruits are sufficient. And they have been 
pure and impeccable, without falsity or hypocrisy. That is sufficient. 


As have been the 100% accurate VISIONS received. Enough said. 

Daniel. 

P.S. The mass prayer for those willing and full of faith comes in days, 
for this weekend. Prepare. Also, after reading the above letters, 
understand why Daniel would ask them to unsubscribe? It's a drain on 
energy. It really is. But always remember I've been aligned to truth, 
that's all that matters, but understand not all will ever accept this. I 
understand. I will never lie to you, nor ever be deluded; it stands 
against everything God entails, that of truth. 

That's a promise made by Daniel to you in the name of God.